Skip to content

Initially, at the start of the housing design project, we were introduced to the Co-Housing (CH) model of living I was apprehensive about this model of living. It could be argued that student’s halls have a similar construct to CH. In the sense that we all had a bedroom, shared a communal kitchen/living-room, some halls had shared bathroom facilities. But the essence of cohousing, in my opinion, is that it’s a collective of different people living together, sharing certain aspects of living, getting to know and live with each other.

After an informative trip to Lancaster Co-housing (LCH) where we participated in one of the main aspects of CH cooking for your fellow residents. Although I didn’t cook my fellow classmates did whilst I discovered what Lancaster had to offer. As I still had some thoughts looming in my mind, what about people that don’t like cooking in a communal area another issue being turn taking for cooking as well.

Figure 1 : Lancaster Co-Housing Site (Lancaster Cohousing, 2013).

 

I would state that if you was an introverted person, who wants to keep to themselves then they wouldn’t sign up to CH, to begin with. One of the major issues I have with CH is turn taking, as I feel in a way you are ‘forced’ to cook on a set day for everyone, what happens if you don’t feel like cooking or have a changed your mind about what you want to eat that day.

My final issue with LCH I found out during the trip, which affects meat eaters, was you aren’t allowed to eat meat in the dining room but you’re not allowed to prep any meat in the kitchen, this seemed illogical to devote meat eater. I would say that I did enjoy the vegan meal we had and enjoyed talking to residents whilst eating, I started to warm to the idea of a shared dining experience as the socialising aspect really made you feel like a community.

Figure 2 : Lancaster Dining (B Smith, House Planning Help 2013).

 

There was more to LCH than just sharing kitchen facilities, it had much more to offer, just outside the common house, most of the shared elements were along the central axis of the site, those being a mail box, food stores, guest house and kids play room. all this being strategically placed in the centre encourages daily encounters with other members of the community, for instance getting mail in the morning and pop into the kitchen to talk with another resident enjoying their breakfast. it’s these little daily social encounters that add to a community.

Figure 3 & 4 : Lancaster alleyway (Reshape, 2017).

LCH also had interesting building on site which was the old mill, as part of the development they had to retain this building for commercial use. After a discussion with the residents, it was apparent that the flexible mixed workspace was very successful, as it was fully occupied by the second year housing a range of different business from, photography, film making, arts and crafts, fashion business. This really sold the idea of CH and LCH as it demonstrated the diversity of residents, their interests and occupations.

Figure 5 : Lancaster Co-Housing Mill (Lancaster Cohousing, 2013).


 

For more infromation on Lancaster Co-Housing check these links bellow.

http://www.lancastercohousing.org.uk/

http://lancastercohousing.blogspot.co.uk/2013_03_01_archive.html

http://www.houseplanninghelp.com/hph028-how-cohousing-helps-build-a-community-with-mark-westcombe-from-lancaster-cohousing/

 

Save

Save

Save

Save

2 responses to “Trip to Lancaster Co-Housing”

  1. As a community style of living, Co-housing is a good choice of model of living. It strengthen the connection between people by providing shared facilities that encourage interaction between people. During the trip to Lancaster Co-housing, i had the chance of participate in the cooking for the residents. From my personal experience, these shared facilities do really help to encourage interaction, but cooking for around 20 people is never an easy job. I personally enjoy cooking but is still effort to cook for such a big community. I totally agree with what Adem had mention, it will be much difficult for people who does not like to cook.

    Lancaster is being well designed, most of the shared elements were along the central axis of the site. The idea of having food stores, guest house and kids play room was great. Being in a remote site, having a food stores inside the co-housing would solve a lot of problem caused by not being close to the city or grocery store. Guest room is an element that most of the people wish to had in their house, because occasionally when there is someone else come over for a visit, people need a place to accommodate their guest, but the room will stay empty most of the time. Being a shared facilities could save up space in the house.

  2. Lancaster Cohousing has been a pioneer for the growing UK cohousing movement and is to be aplauded for its continuing willingness to welcome visitors and spread the word. For those at university, cohousing may eventually be a lifestyle option but it will take many years for it to reach the levels seen elsewhere in Europe. Right now, it may be something to talk to parents about as the community benefits for ‘seniors’ are many. In London, Older Women’s Cohousing (OWCH) and in Colchester, Cannock Mill Cohousing are worth checking out via the UK Cohousing Network.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

School of Architecture
Planning and Landscape
Newcastle upon Tyne
Tyne and Wear, NE1 7RU

Tel: 0191 208 6509

Email: nicola.rutherford@ncl.ac.uk


Hit Counter provided by recruiting services